Tag Archive - pharisees

Why does he speak like that? (Mark 2)

February 18, 2012 in Study & Meditation with 0 Comments

Mark has already told his readers that Jesus is the Son of God, and he’s done a pretty good job of backing that up in what he showed in Chapter 1. John the Baptist pointed the way to him. God himself said Jesus was his son. Even the demons knew who he was and called him the Holy One of God. Then there’s the healing, the authoritative teaching, and the power over the demons.

Not everyone that Jesus encounters accepts who he is, though.

In Mark Chapter 2 and the first part of Chapter 3, there are five stories, all of which show growing opposition. In the course of that opposition, Mark poses another question that we need to consider.

Continue Reading…

Something Greater (Matthew 12)

January 25, 2012 in Study & Meditation with 3 Comments

The Pharisees were extremely knowledgeable about the Law. They were extremely concerned with following the Law themselves, and with others following the Law. They made rules that were even stricter than the Law – as long as you followed the rules, there was no chance of breaking the Law. They were men of great stature and power in society, men with a certain image and reputation to protect.

What they failed to understand, was that there was something greater.

That failing immediately put them at odds with the Teacher, and nowhere is that more apparent than in Matthew Chapter 12. It plays out in three scenes.

In the first, Jesus and his disciples are headed to the synagogue on the Sabbath. They’re hungry. Passing through the grain fields on the way, they pluck a few heads of grain to have something to eat – something that was allowed under the Law. The problem was, this was the Sabbath, and the Pharisees had rules for that. The Law said to remember the Sabbath and keep it holy – do no work. The Pharisees had decided that plucking a head of grain to eat was the same thing as harvesting the whole field would be – it was work. It was “not lawful”. They confronted Jesus.

Jesus used two examples to illustrate the inconsistency and hypocrisy evident in how the Pharisees applied the Law. One was a situation in which one of their heroes clearly broke the Law: the time when David lied to the priest to obtain bread that only the priests were allowed to eat, so that he and his men could eat while on the run from King Saul. The priest, in turn, “bent” the Law, by offering the bread to David. The Pharisees had no criticism of David. The other example he gave was of the Priests, who in doing their priestly duty did do work on the Sabbath – preparing and offering sacrifices in the Temple. That work on the Sabbath, however, was commanded of the priests in the Law, and they were guiltless.

Jesus packs a lot of teaching into the next couple of verses. “There is something greater than the temple here” – if the priests can break the Law without guilt for the sake of the worship in the temple, the disciples could break the rules of the Pharisees for “something greater than the temple” – the Lord himself. He’s the Lord of the Sabbath, and Jesus tells them exactly that. He tells them something else that is greater than their rules – something he told them, or some other Pharisees in Chapter 9 – something he’s been teaching ever since the Sermon on the Mount in Chapter 5. God said, “I desire mercy, not sacrifice”. People are the most important things. How we deal with each other is more important than the rules we follow. Their rules did not equal the Law, but the Pharisees put them ahead of people in need. Jesus declares the disciple guiltless.

In the second scene, they’ve made it to the synagogue, with the Pharisees following along. A man with a withered hand is there.  The Pharisees see the man, and what they saw was an advantage… an opportunity… a means to an end: to accuse Jesus. They ask Jesus if it is lawful to heal on the Sabbath. Jesus sees a person in need, and again confronts their hypocrisy: they’d take care of their livestock that had fallen in a pit (something else commanded in the Law), even on the Sabbath. Jesus tells them clearly what should have been obvious: people are of greater value than animals (and, of course, their rules). Certainly it is lawful to heal a person in need on the Sabbath! He does so, and instead of rejoicing at the great thing that had been done for this man,  they “went out and conspired to destroy him”.

Aware of this, Jesus acts with the gentleness that Isaiah prophesied he would have, and withdraws to another place. The Pharisees are there, too, and thus we have the third scene.

Jesus performs another healing, this time of a man who is blind and mute due to a demon. The people are amazed, and are beginning to put two and two together from the power Jesus is displaying – “could this be the Son of David?” – is he the Messiah? The Pharisees have an answer for that. No, he’s the opposite. Yes, they say he shows power – but it’s only by the power of Beelzebul, the Devil himself, that Jesus drives out demons.

Jesus refutes this with three arguments that make clear how ridiculous that statement is and where the real source of power is coming from, and then warns them of the thin ice they’re skating on.

First, a house divided against itself can’t stand. If Satan was the source of power Jesus was using to cast out demons, it would mean that Satan was using his power to defeat himself. That makes no sense. Second, there are other people who the Pharisees are supportive of – their “sons” – that cast out demons; it doesn’t make sense for the Pharisees to say Jesus does this by Beelzebul but not to apply the same accusation to the others. Third, Jesus says, to rob a strong man you have to first tie up the strong man – be more powerful than him and restrain him. Jesus could only be doing this if he had power over Satan. That power would be the Spirit.

That’s where the warnings begin. You can talk bad about me, he says, and that’s forgivable. Talk bad about the Spirit, though, and that’s unforgivable. What you say shows the evil you have in your hearts, and those words will condemn you – your fruit demonstrates that evil. He uses the language of John the Baptist here (“you brood of vipers”), and what he says has to remind the Pharisees of what John challenged them to do: bear fruit in keeping with repentance.

The Pharisees ask him for a “sign” – do something to prove that what you do comes from the Spirit (like he hasn’t already done enough). Jesus doesn’t fall for the bait-and-switch tactic. He denies them a sign, other than a huge one that will come later: he predicts his death, burial, and resurrection to them, comparing himself in the process to Jonah being in the belly of the fish.

I doubt they understood that at all, but it also gives Jesus a great opportunity to tell them that they’re missing out on “something greater”, and the judgement they’re bringing down on themselves.  Nineveh heard Jonah’s preaching and repented; that’s better than the Pharisees and “this generation” have done, even though they’re in the presence of something greater than Jonah. The Queen of the South gives another example: she went to great lengths to hear the wisdom of Solomon; now something greater than Solomon is here, and the Pharisees and “this generation” don’t want to listen.

The kingdom of heaven is at hand, great things are happening, good news is being shared with this generation. This generation, however, is like a man who has a demon cast out (a timely illustration with what has just happened) but sits empty and doesn’t fill himself up with something to take the place of the demon. That gives the demon a change to come back with his friends and take over. This generation that rejects Jesus will end up worse off than they were at the first.

The Pharisees thought themselves great men, and most everyone else did too. They had an unfortunate habit of “majoring on minors and minoring on majors”, though. Their concern for their rules, their position, their power, their control, and their image had caused them to miss out on the “something greater”: Jesus, his teaching, mercy and concern for people. That put them at odds with Jesus: “Whoever is not with me is against me, and whoever does not gather with me scatters.” “Whoever does the will of my Father in heaven is my brother and sister and mother.”

The question is whether we, too, miss out on the “something greater”. That’s what we’ve seen all through Matthew: the kingdom heart, the compassion and concern for others, what Jesus lived and taught and wanted for us to be and to have. What gets in our way of seeing that “something greater”? Our concern for the traditions we’ve always followed, the rules we take to be gospel? Our image, our pride, or any of the other things the Pharisees were concerned with? It’s time to choose something greater.

Key Verses

“A good man brings good things out of the good stored up in him, and an evil man brings evil things out of the evil stored up in him. But I tell you that everyone will have to give account on the day of judgment for every empty word they have spoken. For by your words you will be acquitted, and by your words you will be condemned.” (v. 35-37)

“Whoever is not with me is against me, and whoever does not gather with me scatters.” (v. 30)

“…whoever does the will of my Father in heaven is my brother and sister and mother.” (v. 50)

Matthew 3

January 11, 2012 in Study & Meditation with 1 Comment

Today’s Reading: Matthew Chapter 3

Another Old Testament prophecy comes true in chapter three as John the Baptist begins his ministry – preaching, calling people to repentance, warning them of the “coming wrath”, and telling them that the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand. As the writer quotes the prophecy of Isaiah, the purpose of his ministry is clear: to prepare the way for the Lord.

What a figure! Living in the wilderness, having given up home, hearth, and family, wearing camel-hair clothes (how itchy is that?) belted around his waist, and eating bugs and honey he collects from the wild.

He has quite a following. “Jerusalem, all Judea, and all the region about the Jordan” are coming out to see him. These are some of the same people that in chapter two were “troubled” at the news that a king had been born – now there’s a very different reaction. So why did they come out? Was it for the unusual character of John – the “freak show” aspect? Maybe some of them – but not all. You can tell that in the reaction of the people. Once they’d come out and heard what he had to say, it clearly had an impact, as they confessed their sins and were baptized in the Jordan. Judea was undergoing a revival.

Even the religious leaders – the Pharisees and Sadducees – are going out to see him, but it doesn’t seem that John accepted that their motives are pure, from the confrontational behavior he displays toward them. As a group (though there are individuals that are presented in a better light), they’re typically portrayed as self-righteous, relying more on their rituals and position than on God and their relationship with Him, and threatened and fearful of thoughts that compete with their teaching. That appears to be John’s take, as he calls them a “brood of vipers” and warns them to not put too much stock in simply being “a child of Abraham”, but instead to produce fruit that shows that they’ve repented – or risk being like the fruitless tree that is cut down and thrown into the fire. Being a jew, having the right lineage, the right family, the right training, the right background – none of that matters – what matters is the fruit one bears.

John was pretty tough on them, but they haven’t seen anything yet. He goes on to tell them of one that is coming – we know that it’s Jesus he’s speaking of – who is far, far mightier than John, and that he’s the one that will actually pass judgement. He uses a metaphor of the one that separates wheat from chaff, gathering the wheat into his barn but burning the chaff. In this instance, those that are considered chaff – the useless waste materials gathered in with the wheat during the harvest – will be burned with “unquenchable fire”. Pretty grim news.

It’s interesting what else John says as he’s comparing himself to Jesus. John’s been doing some incredible stuff in his ministry. He’s truly a prophet – pointing the way to the Kingdom, speaking the truth to power, telling it like it is, stark and direct up to the point of being harsh, but provoking a real heart change in people and then ministering to them. He guides them to the point of realizing and confessing their sins, making a decision to change, and demonstrating that resolve to everyone else. He calls for a real change in behavior, and they’re responding. John lets them know, however, that there’s a limit to what he can do. “I baptize you with water for repentance… He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and fire”. John can only take the people so far. The people themselves can only do so much. The preaching, the confession of sins, the repentance, the change of heart, the desire for a new life is incredible… it has prepared them for Jesus himself. Everything beyond that though, is in His hands.

Then Jesus arrives at the Jordan, and despite John’s protests is baptized himself. It’s a beautiful scene – as he comes out of the water, the heavens open, the Spirit of God descends and comes to rest on him, and God speaks about his love for Jesus and his pleasure in him.

So that’s the summary. I have a lot of questions, though, that I’m wondering about and meditating on – some matter more than others.

  • What was the point to John being so different in dress, appearance, and behavior?
  • When John talked of the Kingdom of Heaven being at hand, exactly what was the Kingdom of Heaven in his eyes? To the minds of the people he was talking to? Was it simply the coming of the King? Was it simply the church, as some think and teach? What more was it?
  • When John tells the religious leaders to “bear fruit in keeping with repentance”, what exactly is he looking for in them? What is that fruit?
  • Why did Jesus come to be baptized? Why did he that had no sin need to go through this act? When Jesus tells John he wants to go through the baptism to “fulfill all righteousness”, what does that mean?
  • When God speaks after the baptism and says He is “well-pleased” – is that directly related to the scene that has just played out, or just with Jesus in general?

I can guess at an answer to any of those questions, but I think they need more thought than a quick guess.

I suppose the only one I really feel like I have a good grasp on is perhaps the question about “fruit in keeping with repentance”. It’s also the area I’m applying to myself and meditating and praying on today.

What is the opposite of “fruit keeping with repentance”? What would be produced by a life that was continuing just as it always had, especially for the religious leaders that John was directly confronting? A life of reliance on self, reliance on the rules and rituals, reliance on position and birth and having been taught the right things, a reliance on having figured out all the doctrine… a reliance on anything but a heart-change. The behavior that would show would be pride and a judgmental attitude, much as I’m sure these religious leaders displayed towards John and his teaching.

So, if that’s the bad fruit, the good fruit simply is what we see in one that relies on God’s grace and mercy. Knowing that he doesn’t have it all figured out, that his background means nothing, that nothing we do is sufficient to earn his favor, and that we have no right to judge others, he turns himself completely over. The result would be what is called the “fruit of the spirit” in Galatians – a live that shows love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness and self-control. The result would be the kinds of attitudes and behaviors that Jesus calls blessed in the Sermon on the Mount – poor in spirit, mourning for sin, meekness, hungering and thirsting for righteousness, mercy, heart-purity, peacemaking.

This is terribly important, because its exactly what He is still looking for in us. Fruit in keeping with repentance. A heart-change. Am I more like the Pharisees and Sadducees that John confronted, or more like the ones that followed John, repented, and later began to follow Christ? I think I still have a lot more work to do – or actually, a lot more submitting to do.

Key Verses:
2 – “Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand”
8 – “Bear fruit in keeping with repentance”